Financial Watchdogs: The Role of Gatekeepers in Combatting Financial Crimes
Financial Watchdogs: The Role of Gatekeepers in Combatting Financial Crimes
Gatekeepers are coveted professions, often considered as ‘entry points’ to the legitimate financial system. Due to this uniquely positioned role, Gatekeepers act as financial watchdogs by detecting, preventing, and mitigating financial crimes. In this blog, we will discuss the role of Gatekeepers in combating financial crimes such as Money Laundering (ML), Terrorism Financing (TF), and Proliferation Financing (PF).
Let us first discuss the professions that comprise Gatekeepers.
Who Are the Gatekeepers?
Gatekeepers are those professions that act as an entry point or a gateway to the legitimate financial system. Due to this placement, Gatekeepers are uniquely situated to prevent the infiltration of illicit funds into the formal financial system.
Gatekeepers include the following professions:
- Lawyers, notaries, and other legal professionals and practitioners
- Auditors and accountants
- Trust and Company Service Providers (TCSPs)
- Real estate agents and brokers.
These professions are at high risk of being unknowingly or unwittingly misused as conduits to commit financial crimes by criminal actors. Therefore, they are regulated under UAE’s Anti-Money Laundering (AML), Combating the Financing of Terrorism (CFT), and Counter Proliferation Financing (CPF) regulatory regime, to protect them and the larger financial system from the menace of ML/TF and PF.
Let us now understand why financial criminals seek to exploit Gatekeepers to conduct ML/TF and PF.
Why Do Gatekeepers Appeal to Financial Criminals?
- Access to Financial Systems: Gatekeepers are considered ‘entry points’ to the financial system due to the nature of their services. Financial criminals seek to use their services to gain access to the legitimate economy.
- Skills and Expertise: Gatekeepers possess specialised knowledge in creating and managing corporate structures such as shell corporations, facilitating real estate transactions, managing funds, etc. Financial criminals seek this expertise to undertake ML/TF and PF, especially to obscure the origin of illicit funds.
- Perception of Legitimacy: Engaging reputable professionals such as Gatekeepers lends an appearance or veneer of legitimacy to financial transactions. This perceived credibility is sought by financial criminals to deter scrutiny from regulatory bodies, allowing illicit activities to go unnoticed.
AML/CFT/CPF Regulatory Obligations of Gatekeepers in UAE
1. Appointing AML/CFT/CPF Compliance Officer:
2. Conducting Enterprise-Wide Risk Assessment
3. Establishing AML/CFT/CPF Policies, Procedures, and Controls:
4. Establishing Customer Due Diligence Procedures:
5. Putting in Place Indicators to Detect ML/TF and PF Risks:
- Red flags associated with high-risk jurisdictions
- Red flags associated with smurfing
- Reg flags pertaining to tax evasion
6. Organising Awareness and Training Program for Staff
7. Establishing Systems for Regulatory Reporting:
- Suspicious Activity Report (SAR) or
- Suspicious Transaction Report (STR)
- High-Risk Country Transaction Report (HRC) or High-Risk Country Activity Report (HRCA)
8. Complying with Targeted Financial Sanctions (TFS) Requirements:
9. Ensuring Record-Keeping:
10. Following Specific Requirements:
For example, Real Estate Activity Report (REAR) for Real Estate Agents.
Let us now discuss the important role Gatekeepers play as financial watchdogs in combating ML/TF and PF.
Role of Gatekeepers in Combating Financial Crimes
Lawyers, Notaries, and Other Legal Professionals and Practitioners
Consider the case of a legal professional in the UAE. A client approaches the legal professional for the management of their funds. During such management, the legal professional notices that the funds involved have their source of origin from third parties. However, the third party has no apparent connection with the client. Further, the funds are then transferred to a foreign jurisdiction that is a high-risk country due to being Blacklisted by FATF.
In this case the following ML/TF and PF red flags are detected:
- The money being transacted has been funded by a third-party with no apparent connection, or any legitimate explanation
- The funds received by the client are transferred to a FATF Blacklisted country, which is considered a high-risk country.
- The legal professional should file the High-Risk Country Report because the transaction involves a high-risk country
- The legal professional should reconduct the Customer Risk Assessment (CRA) and categorise the client as high-risk due to the red flags detected
- The legal professional should verify the Source of Funds and Source of Wealth of the client and ask for further details as part of the Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD) process. If ML/TF and PF risks are detected, the same should be reported through the STR.
Auditors and Accountants
Consider the example of an auditor in the UAE. The auditor is approached by a client to conduct an audit of their business. However, the client is reluctant to provide information and other relevant information required for the audit process. Further, the client makes a request for the auditor to expedite the process and complete the audit process quickly. When the auditor makes further requests for data, the auditor comes to know that the client is unable to provide evidence for real activity, such as business operations. The auditor is unable to get further relevant information due to the client’s hesitancy.
In this case, the following ML/TF and PF red flags are detected:
- Since various red flags are detected, and the auditor is unable to investigate further due to lack of information, the auditor can deboard the client to derisk itself, which is one of the risk treatment strategies
- Since the red flags detected by the auditor are common typologies used to conduct financial crimes, the auditor should report the same through SAR if funds have not been transferred or STR if money has exchanged hands.
Trust and Company Service Provider
Consider the case of a TCSP in the UAE. It is approached by an agent of a client to establish a company in UAE, as well as provide nominee services. The client preferred not to communicate with the TCSP directly. While conducting Know Your Customer (KYC) procedures, TCSP finds that the client’s Ultimate Beneficial Owner (UBO) has several companies in many jurisdictions worldwide, which appear to be shell companies due to a lack of business operations.
In this case, the following ML/TF and PF red flags can be detected:
- The client refused to communicate with the TCSP directly
- The client was a UBO of many shell companies around the world. Misusing shell companies is a common typology used by financial criminals.
- Categorise client as ‘high-risk’ during the Customer Risk Assessment (CRA) process
- Conduct Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD) for the client, and understand their nature and purpose of establishing the company
- If the occurrence of financial crimes is detected, report the same through SAR or STR.
Real Estate Agents and Brokers
- The trust is registered in a known tax haven
- The ownership structure of the trust is complex, and may be so to obscure the identities of Ultimate Beneficial Owners
- The trustee is ready to pay for a luxury property upfront
- Conduct Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD) for the trustee and the trust and ascertain the Source of Funds and Source of Wealth
- Ask for additional information to ascertain the identity of the UBOs
- Investigate suspicions of ML/TF and PF and report the same through STR or SAR.
Best Practices for Gatekeepers to Combat Financial Crimes
Developing and Implementing Effective AML/CFT/CPF Program
Ensuring Thorough Customer Due Diligence
Customer Due Diligence (CDD) is a Gatekeeper’s weapon against illicit actors that seek to misuse the Gatekeeper to commit financial crimes. A new age CDD process must make use of Video-KYC and Perpetual KYC tools. CDD facilitates the Gatekeeper professional to understand the identity of their customers, the ML/TF and PF risks the customer poses to the Gatekeeper.
It enables the Gatekeeper to adopt risk mitigation measures proportionate to the degree of ML/TF and PF risks posed by the customer.
Establishing Systems to Proactively Detect and Mitigate ML/TF and PF Risk
Gatekeepers should establish strong monitoring systems to proactively detect potential ML/TF and PF activities by installing transaction monitoring systems.
Gatekeepers can leverage technologies such as advanced data analytics, Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, etc. Gatekeepers should also ensure that they understand the red flags and common typologies of ML/TF and PF, and the same is part of the AML/CFT/CPF Training for their employees.
Establishing a Culture of AML/CFT/CPF Compliance, Integrity, Accountability and Transparency
Regularly Conducting AML/CFT/CPF Training
Encouraging Open and Transparent Communication
Gatekeepers should encourage open communication and promote a ‘speaking up’ culture. Doing so would ensure that any stakeholder who comes across a suspicious activity or transaction that indicates financial crime risks would promptly report the same internally.
Gatekeepers should also establish a clear process for internal reporting. It should also implement whistleblower policies to ensure their anonymity and protection. The UAE government has become proactive in developing laws requiring various reporting entities and professions to draw up whistleblower policies to ensure regulatory compliance.
Engaging in Cross-Industry and Cross-Sector Collaboration
Gatekeepers should proactively engage with a broad network of organisations across industries and sectors to share useful information, best practices, red flags, etc., that detect and combat financial crimes.
Some organisations have immense experience in detecting ML/TF and PF typologies, while others may be experts at technological solutions to tackle financial crimes. Sharing information ensures that all participants learn from each other’s strengths while addressing their own vulnerabilities. Through this, gatekeepers can strengthen market integrity through collaborative efforts in mitigating ML/TF and PF.
The Role of Gatekeepers in Combatting Financial Crimes: Final Thoughts
About the Author
Pathik Shah
FCA, CAMS, CISA, CS, DISA (ICAI), FAFP (ICAI)
Pathik is a Chartered Accountant with more than 26 years of experience in governance, risk, and compliance. He helps companies with end-to-end AML compliance services, from conducting Enterprise- Wide Risk Assessments to implementing the robust AML Compliance framework. He has played a pivotal role as a functional expert in developing and implementing RegTech solutions for streamlined compliance.

