Reliance on Third Parties for Customer Due Diligence
Reliance on Third Parties for Customer Due Diligence
What Is Customer Due Diligence?
- Collects information and identification documents of the customers
- Verifies their identity documents and authenticates whether the customers are actually who they claim to be
- Enquires about the nature and purpose of the intended business relationship
- Identifies the beneficial owners of the corporate customer and verifies their identified
- Assesses the potential ML/FT risk such customers may pose to the business

What Are The Third Parties The Regulated Entities Can Rely Upon For CDD?
- a financial institution that is subject to and is supervised by a financial regulator; or
- the regulated entity’s branches, subsidiaries, parent entity, the branches and subsidiaries of the parent entity, or any other related corporations.
What Does It Mean By “Reliance On Third Parties For Customer Due Diligence”?
What Conditions Must Be Considered Before Relying On A Third Party For CDD?
- The regulated entity should be able to obtain records or information pertaining to the CDD measures carried out by the third party on an immediate basis,
- The regulated entity should take adequate steps to ensure that the third party shall provide copies of the identification documents relating to CDD to the regulated entity upon request, without delay,
- The third party (not part of the same Financial Group) is adequately regulated, supervised and monitored and has implemented measures for complying with CDD and AML record-keeping requirements as per FATF Recommendations and meeting the provisions of IFSCA (AML, CFT & KYC) Guidelines. When relying on a third party who is part of the same Financial Group, the following conditions must be satisfied:
- the Financial Group applies and implements group-wide programmes on CDD that meets standards set out in FATF Recommendations and
- implementation of CDD and recordkeeping at the group level are supervised by that country’s financial services regulator or some competent authority.
- The third party is not located or based in a country or jurisdiction assessed as high-risk.
- Reliance on a third party cannot be placed for ongoing monitoring of the business relationship with the customer.
- Reliance cannot be placed on third parties explicitly prohibited by the IFSCA from relying upon.
Other Key Considerations Before Relying On A Third Party For CDD
- The regulated entity is not automatically required to obtain certified documents from a third party to carry out CDD. However, the regulated entity should ensure that certified documents are readily available from a third party upon request.
- the regulated entity must assess the jurisdictional or geographical ML/FT associated with the third party, considering the outcome of the FATF publications, mutual evaluation reports, political stability, etc.
- the regulated entity should not rely upon the third party located in the country, which prevents access to CDD data due to secrecy or data protection laws of such country.
- When regulated entities are not satisfied with the CDD measures applied by the third party or the CDD measures are found deficient, the regulated entity shall immediately apply the CDD measures necessary to remediate the deficiencies.
- The regulated entity’s AML/CFT Policy and overall framework must provide for placing reliance on third parties, the extent to which the entity shall rely on such CDD data and the measures the regulated entity shall perform on its own.
- For smooth compliance, the regulated entity must enter into an agreement with the third party when placing reliance on such a party for CDD.
What Are The Benefits Of Relying On A Third Party For CDD?
Sr. No. |
Parameter |
Benefits |
1 |
Experience |
A third party’s experience can be used to enhance the adequacy and quality of CDD measures applied. |
2 |
Time & Cost |
Relying on a third party helps the regulated entity save time and thus increase cost-effectiveness. |
3 |
Independent Perspective |
CDD measures applied by the third party offer an unbiased view (bias related to onboarding the customer for financial benefit could be avoided). |
Conclusion
About the Author
Pathik Shah
FCA, CAMS, CISA, CS, DISA (ICAI), FAFP (ICAI)
Pathik is a Chartered Accountant with more than 26 years of experience in governance, risk, and compliance. He helps companies with end-to-end AML compliance services, from conducting Enterprise- Wide Risk Assessments to implementing the robust AML Compliance framework. He has played a pivotal role as a functional expert in developing and implementing RegTech solutions for streamlined compliance.